I’m fascinated by the
pop science/theology behind near-death experiences. I’ve read the “Life
After Life” books by Raymond Moody and several similar books. It was
interesting to discover another book, “Glimpses Beyond Death’s Door,” by
Brent L. and Wendy C. Top, from the publisher Covenant Communications,
which strictly follows LDS theology and authority. One can assume that
“Glimpses …” has been thoroughly vetted by LDS leaders.
The authors provide a
fascinating, everything-and-the-kitchen-sink, overview of near-death
accounts, using many sources liberally with an emphasis on the “Journal of
Near-Death Studies” and the book “Heaven and Hell,” by Emanuel Swedenborg,
the 18th century Swedish Lutheran and scientist who claimed to have
received access to the afterlife. Also, there are numerous discourses and
writings from LDS Church leaders, including “Journal of Discourses”
accounts from Brigham Young, Parley P. Pratt and Orson Pratt.
If one had to summarize
the “Glimpses …” approach quickly, it’d be, “throw out traditional,
man-made concepts of crime and punishment” and “law and order.” Based on a
consistency in nature of the NDE accounts compiled, compassion and love
are the dominating sensations experienced at death. Whether greeted by
family members, a guardian angel, or a life reviewer, death appears to be
a very positive experience. Many didn’t want to return and were unaffected by
the grieving of family members and friends.
(I will digress here to
mention that for this essay, I am assuming that these experiences are
real, although other than the amount of professed NDEs out there, they
certainly can’t be proven. Belief in divinity, an afterlife, or other
theological claims cannot be proven, and that’s why heated debate usually
leads nowhere. But even for skeptics, I’d wager the topic has interest.)
LDS theology teaches
that after death, we go to a spirit world, which is located here on earth,
but in another sphere which we can’t see as mortals. Much of “Glimpses …”
is devoted to taking the many NDEs of Swedenborg, Moody and others, and
applying what they witnessed as glimpses into an LDS-taught afterlife spirit
world. While readers must be aware that the authors can pick and choose
sources as they wish, the Tops do make an effort to put most precedence on NDEs
from non-Mormon sources.
Based on “Glimpses …,”
it’s clear that death, and the subsequent journey into a spirit existence,
is not a place where a “true church,” or “true gospel,” is revealed to
newly arrived spirits. In fact, the most persons who have had NDEs, the
authors claim, experience a jump in spirituality, but not any discernible
move toward a particular religion. In fact, the afterlife spirit world,
based on many of the NDE accounts, is a place where autonomy, the ability
to choose, still exists for the deceased person.
Despite being in a
sphere that is more advanced than earth’s (time travel and increased,
almost effortless comprehension of reason, memory and why bad things
happen have been reported) there is no traditional purgatory or
hell. However, most accounts show a separation of spirits based on
knowledge accumulated and charitable love expressed for others while on
earth. The spirits who might be in a place considered “paradise” are not
tethered to their own self interests or to so-called worldly pleasures. They
want to serve others. They also appear to shine with a greater light.
Spirits who might be considered to be in a “prison” are focused on their
own personal needs or worldly indulgences. It is hypothesized that these
latter group of spirits, still obsessed with the world and themselves, are
those who haunt TV ghost shows, or seances, etc.
Not surprisingly,
spirits tend to congregate based on similarities of light and interests. It
is hypothesized by many that more self-centered spirits are simply not
comfortable within the light that more “righteous” spirits possess. Hence,
“hell” or spirit “prison” is defined not as an application of pain, but an
inability to comfortably exist with other, more righteous people. (This
frequent NDE observation may be one reason that conservative,
fundamentalist Christians, who preach a literal hell of eternal pain and
fire, are often very skeptical of NDEs.)
In “Glimpses …,” the
authors point to these distinctions, personal autonomy, and the absence of
a “true church” or “gospel” as evidence that missionary work is active in
the afterlife spirit world. This is one main concept, of course, that
distinguishes this NDE book from others. What may surprise LDS readers of
“Glimpses …” is that missionary work in the spirit world appears to be harder
than missionary work here on earth. The Tops quote Swedenborg, who
describes an afterlife of spirits waiting to be taught more information,
but not until they are ready to receive it.
One of the more
interesting concepts of afterlife found in “Glimpses …” is that it is far
harder to convert a spirit than it was during that spirit’s mortal
existence. That’s because a spirit retains all that he or she learned —
secular or non-secular — into the spirit world. Personalities and
beliefs are molded in life, as well as passions, biases, prejudices and
pride. In other NDEs recounted in “Glimpses …,” persons who had been
skeptics of divine authority while on earth were observed still believing
what they had once taught, and rationalizing, in a manner favorable to their
own self interests, what they were now experiencing.
The idea that persons
are assigned in the afterlife based on where they feel comfortable
is similar to the C.S. Lewis novella, “The Great Divorce,” where residents
of “hell” are taken on a journey to “heaven,” where spirits there minister
to those in hell and attempt to convince them to remain with them, endure
some discomfort (a metaphor for repentance), and live in heaven. Most of
the travelers reject the offer, either because they are still afflicted with
self pride and self pity, or, interestingly, believe that they are already
in heaven.
That may sum up a key
theme of “Glimpses …,” which is that in the spirit world, we end up
basically where we are most comfortable. In Mormon doctrine, this requires
a Millennium’s worth of missionary work, and the attendant effort to bring
everyone to knowledge of God’s plan of salvation. Rather than viewed
condescendingly, or as a tool to argue with, “Glimpses …” can be
an interesting — and unique — opportunity to learn how Mormon
theology views NDEs and how it fits into its doctrine.
- Doug Gibson
A version of this
column was previously published at StandardBlogs.
No comments:
Post a Comment