Ask an active Mormon if she or he knows what a "second
anointing" is, and I'd wager most of the time you’ll receive a blank
stare.
However, second anointings, or second blessings, are still
performed today in temples, albeit rarely. A century ago, second anointings
were far more common.
A second anointing was an extension of the temple endowment.
My best definition of it is as a guarantee of exaltation, but others may
disagree with that.
Through the first third of the 20th century, about 21,000
couples had received second anointments. One could not apply for one; stake
presidents determined who received one. It was usually reserved for longtime
Saints with a lifetime of church fidelity; preference was also given to
pioneers. Eventually, church officials took the selection process away from
stake presidents and gave it to apostles. At that point, second anointings
slowed to a trickle, despite the pleadings of apostle and Salt Lake Temple
President George F. Richards to resume its regular practice. Richards, by the
way, is responsible for many, many changes in temple ceremonies and customs
adopted by the LDS Church Presidency in the early 20th century.
This information, and much more, is contained in a book from
Signature, "The Development of LDS Temple Worship 1846-2000: A Documentary History." Edited by historian Devery S. Anderson, the book is comprised of
memos, instructions, personal opinions, debates, decisions and declarations
shared among LDS Church officials and leaders. It is a fascinating historical look
at the evolution of LDS temple worship. (I
digress to assure readers that nothing of a sacred or secret temple worship
nature is in this documentary history).
But what readers discover in this book underscores the lack
of enthusiasm LDS authorities sometimes have to reveal more about the church’s
unique, interesting history. How many Latter-day Saints today know that the 19th
century Mormon garment had a collar; went from the neck, to ankles and wrists,
was crotchless, and used strings instead of buttons?
Placed within this column
is an old advertisement of a “modern” ladies garment that was compared to a
union suit. Showing this garment is not disrespectful because of another fact
that is learned in the book: For a long time, garments were sold without the
sacred marks on them. The stitching of those marks were the responsibility of
the owner and was done by someone worthy of a recommend. Over time, church
leaders discontinued advertising and the outside selling of garments. One
reason: many stores were selling them in fashions that were not church-approved
at the time, such as straps instead of sleeves on ladies garments.
The importance of members wearing the LDS garment is a focus
of many of the book’s correspondence. Indeed, LDS leader Brigham Young told
church officials that Joseph Smith and Hyrum Smith died in Carthage, Ill.
because they had taken their garments off. Young said that Willard Richards
survived the Carthage attack because he was wearing his. Wounded in that same
attack was a future LDS leader, John Taylor.
LDS Church leaders pondered and debated the temple-worthy
status of divorced women, of those who married out of the LDS Church, whether
black children could be sealed to white parents, the age of eligibility for
endowments, how many leaves should be sewn on a temple apron, etc. The
endowment ceremony, originally an oral tradition, was finessed with a script
and audio and motion pictures became a necessity as the church grew in the
world. For years, the LDS temple ceremony included a short scene – with
permission – from the Disney film, “Fantasia.”
More issues discussed include the gradual insistence on
following the Word of Wisdom to enter a temple, the small payments allowed
persons who stood in proxy for endowments, and so on. But I want to focus on
two more events, one sober and shameful, and another that tickled my funny
bone.
The book recounts
church leaders receiving a request from Joseph Smith’s black servant, Jane
Manning James, who came to Utah and remained a faithful Latter-day Saint. As
her life drew to a close late in the 19th century, she asked to be
sealed to the church’s first prophet. Such sealings were not unusual at the
time, but “Aunt Jane,” as she was called, was of course considered to have the
“curse of Cain.” In a then-compassionate gesture that would be considered
grotesque today, church leaders rejected her request for a family sealing, but
as a compromise, sealed Jane to Smith as Celestial servant. One hopes that this
sealing was changed after blacks received the priesthood scores of years later.
FLOATING TEMPLES TRIAL BALLOON
The second event involved a suggestion in the late 1960s
that the LDS Church construct a “floating temple” that would sail the seven
seas and provide, via docking, temple rooms and ceremonies on board for
Latter-day Saints who lived outside the U.S., and far away from a temple could
receive endowments, etc. This idea, suggested by a church building coordinator,
gained some traction until LDS Apostle Elder Alan R. Dyer, in a leadership
meeting, pointed to the LDS scriptural book, Doctrine & Covenants, Section
61, verses 14 to 16, which reads:
14 “Behold, I, the
Lord, in the beginning blessed the water; but in the last days, by the mouth of
my servant John, I cursed the waters.
15 “Wherefore, the
days will come that no flesh shall be safe upon the waters.
16 ”And it shall be
said in days to come that none is able to go up to the land of Zion upon the
waters, but he that is upright in heart.”
That early-church revelation effectively ended talk of a
floating temple. I recall, in 1983, as a missionary in Peru, being warned about
entering lakes and oceans, with the same scriptures being cited.
-- Doug Gibson
This post was originally published at StandardBlogs.
Terrific post, Doug. Keep them coming.
ReplyDeleteI bought Anderson's "Development....of LDS Temple Worship" at MHA a few years back and found it a great read. It is a rare member nowadays who has the interest and/or courage to read edited works such as this let nor even Gospel Topics Essays on LDS.org. As you said the book is comprised of un-edited letters, memos, confidential policy statements and other correspondence in the between Church leaders. The only question I have is we're the documents obtained from the archives illicitly or without proper permission. I would love to speak to you about some of this when we have the opportunity.