Review by Doug Gibson
Note: I reviewed the novel, "No Going Back," by Jonathan Langford in 2009. It was published only of StandardBlogs, a feature that the Standard-Examiner newspapaer carelessly allowed to go defunct. In the most recent William Morris email of A Motley Vision, Morris remembered Langford -- who died eight years ago. He paid tribute to his sole novel, which is an excellent book. I decided to search Wayback and find my review of "No Going Back." It has comments from that time, including one from Mr. Langford. To achieve permanence for the review, I place it here on the Culture of Mormonism blog.
“I made my choice. I did the right thing and
stood up for the church. But it’s just so hard. Being around people. People not
liking me. People pretending I’m not even there.”
-
Or so says teenager
Paul Ficklin, a gay Latter-day Saint in freelance writer Jonathan Langford’s
novel, “No Going Back.” The new Zarahemla Books offering has a premise that
many haven’t contemplated before. It allows the reader to get inside the head
of an active-in-the-church gay teenager who desperately wants to live the
Gospel and the law of chastity even if it will deny him the instinctive,
God-given need of future love, companionship and family.
In “No Going Back,”
Paul rejects a gay/straight alliance club at his school because it teaches him
to reject LDS doctrine and embrace his sexuality. As a result he is outed by a
vindictive member.
The irony is he feels
far less acceptance from his straight school and LDS Church peers — in fact
he’s frequently taunted — than from the GSA former friends who he left.
Although it’s didactic
at times and has too much sequence introductions with characters thinking, “No
Going Back” is a powerful tale. The story revolves around Paul’s long
relationship with his straight friend, Chad Mortensen, who happens to be the
bishop’s son. Chad is the first person to which Paul reveals his homosexuality.
Though there are a lot of bumps in the road — some of it normal best friend
spats — Chad ultimately becomes Paul’s biggest defender. Another help to Paul
is his single mom, Barbara. Chad’s father, Bishop Richard Mortensen, also
provides potentially lifesaving encouragement to Paul, counseling Paul through
his teenage years with a constant reminder to him that LDS doctrine does not regard
same-sex attraction by itself as a sin and that God loves him.
But one dilemma Paul
has throughout most of the novel is a constant loneliness that comes with being
gay and having longings completely distinct from his role models and most
friends. Pushing away from those at the GSA — who encourage him to be a gay
teen — so he can live his religious beliefs comes with a price I think most
straight people wouldn’t accept.
There is a scene
midway in “No Going Back” where Bishop Mortensen, overworked and dealing with
marital stress, chats with his kindly father in law, a former local church
leader. His father in law disapproves of how Mortensen is handling Paul as too
permissive. The scene is probably a microcosm of the hell many gay people
experience when dealing with religious leaders. Their feelings, which they
can’t control, are deemed sinful. In the LDS Church, that is not true. The
irony, as Paul discovers, is that not enough of his church peers, even perhaps
those in authority, have learned that.
Langford’s novel is
not designed to please those who take strident positions pro and con on gay
rights. It’s no coincidence that a Prop. 8-type gay marriage battle is included
as a backdrop to the plot in “No Going Back.” I’ve read a lot of different
viewpoints on Langford’s novel on LDS-related Web sites. It’s getting a lot of
buzz, which I hope helps Zarahemla’s sales.
Many, I fear, will
scorn “No Going Back” due to its protagonist choosing to stay with a religion
that calls his preferred sexual practice a sin. They have a point that seems to
make sense: Be who you are. But religion doesn’t always make sense. It calls
for obedience. There are no doubt countless young people with same-sex
attraction trying to obey a traditional Christian lifestyle. And the gay/straight
alliance, which preaches tolerance, has no tolerance for Paul after he tells
them he regards homosexuality as a sin.
What’s missing in the
harsh criticism religion gets often in regards to issues such as gay marriage
is that it is only a very small part of an entire belief system. To place too
much emphasis on one aspect of the gospel can be a road to apostasy, whether
it’s the Word of Wisdom or gay marriage. Paul learns that during his
experiences.
In “No Going Back,” we
don’t know if Paul’s going to make it long term as a faithful member. A
spiritual survivor, he’s plugging away, reading his scriptures, praying and
going to church.
In a poignant scene,
Paul seeks out the church patriarch who gave him a blessing, asking for more
insight on his future family life. His recorded blessing is vague on that. He
gets sympathy and some platitudes, but no answer.
Although
disillusioned, Paul remains an active Mormon, trying to do the best he can in
the world God sent him to to be tested. The difference from most of us is the
added burden of being gay that Paul has to deal with.
As I seem to mention
every time I review a Zarahemla novel, I wish this book was on the shelves at
Deseret Book. A lot of us could benefit by reading it.